Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.advisorHohn, Janna
dc.contributor.advisorKnese, Dennis
dc.contributor.authorHügle, Lukas
dc.contributor.otherFachbereich Architektur und Bauingenieurwesen
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T05:08:26Z
dc.date.available2024-06-28T05:08:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://hlbrm.pur.hebis.de/xmlui/handle/123456789/183
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25716/pur-134
dc.description.abstractTo improve livability and sustainable mobility functions of urban street space, municipalities may implement street experiments. Respective temporary interventions can help to accelerate transformations, broaden public involvement, facilitate social and institutional learning, and strengthen adaptive capacity. To support the integration of such experiments as transformative planning tools, this thesis presents a comparative case study contrasting viable approaches. Reviewing literature, planning guidelines, and documents, two experimental strategies were identified which expand on existing typologies: Temporary street use actions which promote flexibility and diversity of spatial uses, and phase 0 actions which facilitate permanent reconstruction through on-site design iterations. Based on a broad set of reference cases, thematic types of temporary street use (street events, periodic pop-up street uses, interim street uses) and phase 0 actions (selective street improvements, corridor planning, neighborhood planning) were established. Three in-depth case studies involving interviews with planners were conducted to understand the shifting roles of municipal planning (promoter, partner, enabler) and associated roles of planners during implementation of these different types of actions: First, community-run temporary play streets in Berlin (periodic pop-use). Second, Malmö’s summer streets as collaborative effort between administration and local initiatives (interim use). Third, Low Traffic Neighborhood (LTN) trials in Hackney, London (neighborhood planning). The comparative study illustrates potential merits and challenges associated with these different types of actions. For a truly adaptive planning approach, street experiments should be implemented within a strategic framework. To varying extents, this includes clear objectives, adequate allocation of staff and time to prepare, an engagement and communications strategy as well as systematic evaluations. This thesis focuses on the municipal perspective on planning and implementation. Tailoring project design to local needs requires an understanding of who benefits from street experiments. Future research should thus study their social impacts and seek out perspectives of diverse groups.
dc.format.extent185 S.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHochschule RheinMain
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.subjecttemporary street use
dc.subjectphase 0 action
dc.subjecttemporary intervention
dc.subjecttransformation research
dc.subjecturban livability
dc.subjectsustainable urban mobility
dc.subjectmobility planning
dc.subjecturban planning
dc.subjectlow traffic neighbourhood
dc.subjectstreet experiment
dc.subjectplay street
dc.subjectsummer street
dc.subjecttransition study
dc.subject.ddc300 Sozialwissenschaften::380 Handel, Kommunikation, Verkehr
dc.subject.ddc300 Sozialwissenschaften::300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie und Anthropologie::302 Soziale Interaktion
dc.titleStreet Experiments as Transformative Planning Tools: Contrasting Adaptive Approaches towards Urban Livability and Sustainable Urban Mobility
dc.typeMasterarbeit
dcterms.accessRightsopen access


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben:
Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International