Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributorForschungszentrum Rhein-Main Institute for Transformative Sciences in Mobility and Logistics (RITMO)
dc.contributor.authorGrüner, Sebastian Ludwig
dc.contributor.authorKowald, Matthias
dc.contributor.otherFachbereich Architektur und Bauingenieurwesen
dc.contributor.otherFachgruppe Mobilitätsmanagement
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-09T06:52:24Z
dc.date.available2025-05-09T06:52:24Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://hlbrm.pur.hebis.de/xmlui/handle/123456789/294
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25716/pur-185
dc.description.abstractBackground Bike-sharing-systems (BSS) are crucial for reducing carbon emissions in individual transportation and optimizing spatial and mobility efficiency. However, BSSs are not fully utilized, especially as primary means of transportation for daily commutes. Feedback from users has been the main source for evaluating BSSs and determining its utility so far. Research on non-users is lacking, despite their significant portion of the population. Our research addresses this gap by investigating perceptions and usage-barriers of non-users. Methods Our research uses focus group discussions (FGD) with 42 commuting non-users of BSSs conducted in Q4 2022 and Q4 2023. Segmented FGDs are composed based on sociodemographic criteria such as gender (50 %/ 50 %) and family status (children in household yes/no). We identify and categorize non-user´s perception and views on BSSs by drawing on expectancy-value theory and means-end-chain theory. We apply deductive and inductive coding, and our results are validated by Krippendorff’s alpha. Results A framework of system attributes and their effects is developed. We identify twelve functional main themes (augmentations of mobility options, app registration and use, bikes and BSS-stations, physical exertion, expenditure of time, connectivity and intermodality) contributing to five specific consequences (social desirability, simplicity of system use, successful path accomplishment, straightforward and non-binding, flexibility and spontaneity, social desirability). Aside from functional drawbacks (e.g. physical exertion, limited connectivity), the primary obstacle for non-users is a dominant convenience of existing mobility options and a lack of information on system use and on beneficial use cases. Conclusion Our findings suggest a stronger focus on non-user perspectives to identify critical issues to increase attractiveness of BSSs. Practitioners may lower adoption barriers (usage information, app registration, physical exertion, connectivity etc.) and emphasize communication of affective use cases and system benefits.
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL
dc.format.extent220–243
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofTransport Policy
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectBike-sharing-systems
dc.subjectBSS
dc.subjectSharing
dc.subjectNon-user
dc.subjectMeans-end chain theory
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.subject.ddc300 Sozialwissenschaften
dc.subject.ddc300 Sozialwissenschaften::380 Handel, Kommunikation, Verkehr::388 Verkehr
dc.titleBike-sharing, why not? A framework of utility perceptions of BSSs' non-users based on qualitative data
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
pur.source.issue168
dc.description.versionPublished Version
pur.source.date2025
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.03.024
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.03.024
pur.fundingProjectGerman Federal Ministry for Digital and Transport, 16DKV30150
pur.fundingProjectGerman Federal Ministry for Digital and Transport, 16DKV42038
pur.peerReviewtrue
pur.typeDCMIText


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige

Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben:
Namensnennung 4.0 International